Translate

Sunday, April 1, 2018

The May 12 deadline to fix the Iran nuclear deal




The Trump administration has given European powers a May 12 deadline to engage in a conversation over “fixing” the nuclear accord






LOS ANGELES – A monumental shift regarding the Iranian nuclear deal, may be fast approaching and could change the “rules of the game” in the Middle East, warned Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.

Speaking to the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, Danon predicted that the executive body will soon have to make a monumental decision: either work with America to halt Iranian aggression in the Middle East or enable the Islamic Republic to continue wreaking havoc in the region.

“We are now at a critical juncture. It is the last chance to correct the mistakes of the past and recognize that we all must set off on a new path aimed at reining in Iran’s reckless behavior,” Danon said during his address.

“To the permanent members of this council, I have a simple message: Do not miss this opportunity. In 45 days, the clock will run out and the rules of the game will change,” he said.

 “You now have a choice to make,” said Danon. “Either choose to work with the Americans and support their genuine efforts to make the Middle East a safer place or choose Iran and enable a dangerous regime. I urge you to make the right choice.”


Earlier this year, the Trump administration entered talks with Britain, France and Germany on ways to address their joint concerns with an international nuclear deal brokered with Iran in July 2015. China and Russia are also signatories to the accords and are also involved in separate discussions with world powers.

European governments that were a part of negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program hope to preserve the accord largely in its current form. But President Donald Trump wants amendments to the deal, or a supplemental US-EU deal tacked onto it that will effectively impose new terms on Iran over its long-term nuclear work.

The Trump administration has given European powers a May 12 deadline to engage in a conversation over “fixing” the nuclear accord. Trump threatens to withdraw from the deal “immediately” if they do not comply, Vice President Mike Pence told the Knesset in January.

Trump specifically wants other world powers to recognize the link between Iran’s nuclear weapons program and its work on ballistic missiles designed to carry nuclear warheads. He also wants them to clarify whether international inspectors have snap access to Iranian military sites that may host nuclear weapons experimentation, as they have in the past, and to address expiration dates built into the nuclear deal to prevent Tehran from ultimately growing its nuclear infrastructure to industrial scale.

Earlier this week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told senior aides that the White House is leaning toward a full withdrawal from the nuclear deal if “significant changes” aren’t made to the agreement, according to online news publication Axios.

Channel 10 later reported that Netanyahu told the foreign ministers of France and Germany, who traveled to Israel for a state visit on Monday, that the US would likely walk out of the agreement.

The report said that when Foreign Minister Heiko Maas replied that Germany thinks having a deal is better than the alternative, Netanyahu replied: “The Munich agreement from 1938 was also a deal.”

During his address to the Security Council, Danon also reserved time to condemn the Palestinian Authority after it recently announced that it will continue to pay the salaries of convicted terrorists and their families.

“[PA President] Mahmoud Abbas has once again revealed his true intentions as he directly funds hundreds of millions of dollars to terrorists with blood on their hands,” Danon fumed.

The Israeli envoy added: “Once again, the Palestinians have responded to American initiatives aimed at reconciliation with support for terror and violence. We call on the international community, and the United Nations, to join the US in their pledge to put an end to the funding of Palestinian terror.”

The rebuke came after Riyad Mansour, the representative of the PLO at the UN, slammed the US after Congress passed the Taylor Force Act on Friday. The legislation aims to cut American funds to the PA unless it takes steps to stop making what lawmakers described as payments that reward violent crime.

“We look at that act as being a hostile act to withdraw the economic assistance to the Palestinian people,” Mansour told the UN.

“Not allowing a responsible government such as the Palestine government in dealing with their political prisoners and their families and those who lose their lives in the struggle for the independence of our state – all these methods are arm-twisting, blackmailing, and will not break the will of the Palestinian people,” he said.

The measure was named after 29-year-old American military veteran Taylor Force, who was fatally stabbed by a Palestinian while visiting Israel in 2016.

Michael Wilner in Washington contributed to this report.

Dry Bones: Gaza Command


Saturday, March 31, 2018

Summary of the Gaza riots, 3.30.2018 Posted by Israel Defense Forces


Michael Oren on France 24 quotes the head of Hamas:“the goal of the demonstration was to enable the people of Gaza to eat the livers of Israelis”




Nadia Charbit, France 24:

For more for an Israeli response we can cross to our guest. Michael Oren is a deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s office and the former Israeli ambassador to the United States. Thank you very much for being with us on France 24.  Looking first at that huge death toll, did yesterday’s events get out of hand?

Michael Oren:

Not at all. Good to be with you and thank you. Not at all.  Hamas drove civilians towards Israel’s border in the attempt to break that border in an attempt to kill Israelis and Israeli soldiers defended  themselves, defended our citizens as they have to. Hamas bears full responsibility for this. Among those demonstrators were terrorists. Hamas has now announced that 5 of those killed yesterday were active terrorists in the organization, they planted bombs along the border, using human shields. Hamas, an organization that is recognized by Europe as a terrorist organization bears full responsibility.

Nadia Charbit:

As you said Hamas has confirmed 5 of those killed were militants. That still leaves at least 11 civilians and there are no Israeli casualties. Was live fire really a proportionate response to the protest?

Michael Oren:

Indeed, every single person killed yesterday was involved in active hostility against our troops in the attempt to break to the border and kill Israelis . The head of Hamas, just recently in the last hour  announced, Mr. Sinwar announced that the goal of the demonstration was to enable the people of Gaza “ to eat the livers of Israelis”, and I am quoting:“eat the livers of Israelis” . This was a terrorist action disguised as a civilian protest, and I can’t think of anything more cynical than using these Gazans as human shields in order to attack Israelis.

Nadia Charbit:

Now this protest is due to last 6 weeks. Will the military review its response to avoid the repeat of the bloodshed we saw yesterday?

 Michael Oren:

Our review has already been conducted and the conclusion is as it stands now is to beef up our defenses along our borders.  The incidents of yesterday were entirely justified, entirely necessary, and if Hamas keeps on using the shields of human beings  of civilians attack our border to try to break through and kill our civilians, the army will take all measures necessary  to defend us.

Nadia Charbit:

Will the military only respond on the border on the day to day basis?   

Michael Oren:

It will take all necessary measures. We are not out to hurt Gaza civilians. In my job in government I am in charge of trying to improve the humanitarian conditions in Gaza and I must tell you Hamas does everything possible to starve its own population and even the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank under Mahmud Abas has cut off all subsidies, all medical help to Gaza, and everyone is trying to use these poor people to make a point. Israel has no interest in increasing casualties there but Israel will do everything possible and necessary to defend our citizens.

Nadia Charbit:

It sounds as if you are approving the idea of collective a punishment on all Gazans. Is there no lee way to alleviate the humanitarian situation?

Michael Oren:

Well, I am in touch with a number of European governments about relieving that humanitarian situation. It is very difficult.  With Hamas refusing to allow aid trucks to go into Gaza so that Hamas can claim to the world that it is suffering . With the Palestinian Authority cutting off all aid, cutting off subsidies, cutting of salaries for 50000 workers in Gaza.  Now, Israel cannot affect that. It cannot. We have the only open border into Gaza. The Egyptian border crossings are all closed. We are ready to bring through 1200 trucks a day in food and aid. Hamas has reduced it to 400. Hamas has reduced it to 400, not Israel. So this is not collective punishment by Israel. What happened yesterday was our legitimate means to defend ourselves and we will continue doing that. But we also stand ready to try to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. But frankly, it is in the hands of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority.

Nadia Charbit:

 Michael Oren, thank you very much for having spoken to us.

5:35  to 9:44 into the video 

Sunday, March 25, 2018

A real hero shines in contrast to the cowards of the European political classes

Arnaud Beltrame


TRĂˆBES, France—A gunman killed four people Friday in a terrorist attack that tore through roadways and a supermarket, including a gendarme who traded places with a hostage. 

“In giving his life to end the murderous escapade of a jihadist terrorist, he fell as a hero,” French President Emmanuel Macron said in a statement on Saturday morning. “At the heart of the action, Lt. Col. Beltrame showed exceptional composure and illustrated his extraordinary military virtues,” Mr. Macron said. “He deserves the respect and admiration of the entire nation.” 

Friday, March 23, 2018

John Bolton’s tuna





This morning at the supermarket I got some extra tuna.  Just in case. Some extra food and water is good to have. I called it John Bolton’s tuna

With Trump, John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Nikki Haley, the chance of the US and Israel attacking Arak, Isfahan, Natanz and Qom nuclear sites is increasing. 

John Bolton in LA Times: “The real choice we are faced with is dealing with the consequences of military action [against Iran] or the consequences of a nuclear Iran.” 


 “The proposition being put before you tonight is that you have a choice between war and an Iran with the bomb.  You have a choice as has been said before, between war and dishonor – you will choose dishonor this evening and you will get war.  You have a choice between a war with a nuclear Iran, or a war at some point, with an Iran that is not nuclear which you stop from ever being nuclear, and hope that in stopping that regime  in embedding itself, you will give the Iranian people the best chance of overthrowing that regime. But as I say, thank God this does not rely on you or any Europeans. Because you’ve made the same mistake before and nobody should trust you to get it right this time.”
 

John Bolton: Mr. Trump: Withdraw From the Iran Nuclear Deal

Why Netanyahu is indispensable for Israel



Haaretz journalist Ari Shavit wrote in 2012:

“A few years ago, Netanyahu held an in-depth discussion with Middle East expert Bernard Lewis. At the end of the talk, he was convinced that if the ayatollahs obtained nuclear weapons, they would use them. Since that day, Netanyahu seems convinced that we are living out a rerun of the 1930s.”

Monday, March 19, 2018

Why Netanyahu is indispensable for Israel















                     

  

Yaakov Katz writes: “But let us be clear: Israel was strong before Netanyahu, and Israel will be strong after Netanyahu.” Yet he completely misses the main point – Iran.

Being strong is not enough. An Israeli leader has to understand the nature of the Iranian threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the only Israeli leader who understands the nature and, consequently, the magnitude of the Iranian threat. He is the only one who was briefed by Bernard Lewis. Haaretz journalist Ari Shavit wrote in 2012:

“A few years ago, Netanyahu held an in-depth discussion with Middle East expert Bernard Lewis. At the end of the talk, he was convinced that if the ayatollahs obtained nuclear weapons, they would use them. Since that day, Netanyahu seems convinced that we are living out a rerun of the 1930s.”

Mr. Netanyahu is also the only leader in the world who quoted Mr. Lewis’s warning: “For people with this mindset, MAD [mutually assured destruction] is not a constraint; it is an inducement....”

Former IDF chief of staff Moshe Ya’alon used to be the other Israeli leader who was aware of the eschatological threat from Iranian “twelvers.” Then he became a politician and started contradicting himself. So now, only Bibi is left.


MLADEN ANDRIJASEVIC 
Beersheba 





Do we remember Winston Churchill for his trips on HMS Enchantress when he was First Lord of the Admiralty from October 1911 to May 1915, or do we remember him for preparing the Royal Navy for the First World War and as the man who saved the West in the Second World War?
From Young Titan by Michael Shelden, page 288:
Best of all, the yacht allowed him to enjoy longer cruises that combined business and pleasure. His Mediterranean voyage to confer with Jacky Fisher in 1912 was followed in May of 1913 by another trip to Malta and this time also to Greece. The public purpose was to review fleet operations and discuss strategy with commanders, but ample time was left for playing in the sun.

Back in Britain there were a few complaints from members of the Labour Party that Churchill was stretching the rules “by inviting his lady friends to accompany him on yachting trips at public expense”.