Two years ago Alan Dershowitz finally began to realize
the immense danger of Obama’s policy on Iran and he wrote several
articles:
But now comes a piece in the Jerusalem
Post that makes no sense. Dershowitz cannot have it both ways. You
cannot be a stringent critic of Obama’s Iran policy and then praise how Obama
talked about “shared values between our country and Israel” because if these
values had any significance to Obama he would not be enabling Iran to become a
nuclear power and be pushing the world towards a nuclear war. Apparently Dershowitz never really understood
the catastrophe behind Obama’s appeasement of Iran or he thinks Israelis would
still swallow this inconsistency in his thinking. But we do live under an Iranian nuclear threat and we
can just wonder how blind and insensitive or just dumb Dershowitz really is.
Having just listened to Obama's speech at a conservative Jewish
Congregation in DC, I was reminded why I supported him both times he ran for
president, as well as when he ran for the US Senate.
I have been a strident critic of
President Obama’s policy toward Iran, especially how he and his team have been
negotiating with that belligerent regime over its nuclear weapons program. But
opposition to one aspect of the Obama policies should not be mistaken for
opposition to President Obama himself or to the many achievements of his
administration, particularly in the domestic area.
Having just listened to his speech at a conservative Jewish Congregation in Washington, DC, I was reminded why I supported him both times he ran for president, as well as when he ran for the United States Senate. Barak Obama is a good and decent person, who admires the Jewish people and supports Israel’s right to exist as the Nation State of the Jewish People as well as its right to defend itself against attacks, both domestic and foreign. He disagrees with the Netanyahu administration on several issues. On some of these issues, such as settlement building, I tend to agree with Obama. On other issues, such as the Iran negotiations, I tend to agree with Prime Minister Netanyahu.
On a personal level, I do not think that President Obama has handled his relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu in a mature and productive fashion. Having been provoked by Speaker Boehner’s invitation to have Netanyahu speak to Congress, President Obama acted in a petulant manner that exacerbated the differences between them. I also disapprove of how President Obama handled Netanyahu’s statements regarding the two state solution. Recall on the evening of Netanyahu’s election, he made a statement suggesting that the time was not now ripe for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Immediately following his election, Netanyahu reasserted his commitment to the two state solution. Instead of reacting in a statesmanlike way by focusing on Netanyahu’s positive restatement, Obama reemphasized his opposition to Netanyahu’s previous negative statements. This was poor politics, poor statesmanship and poor psychology.
Having just listened to his speech at a conservative Jewish Congregation in Washington, DC, I was reminded why I supported him both times he ran for president, as well as when he ran for the United States Senate. Barak Obama is a good and decent person, who admires the Jewish people and supports Israel’s right to exist as the Nation State of the Jewish People as well as its right to defend itself against attacks, both domestic and foreign. He disagrees with the Netanyahu administration on several issues. On some of these issues, such as settlement building, I tend to agree with Obama. On other issues, such as the Iran negotiations, I tend to agree with Prime Minister Netanyahu.
On a personal level, I do not think that President Obama has handled his relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu in a mature and productive fashion. Having been provoked by Speaker Boehner’s invitation to have Netanyahu speak to Congress, President Obama acted in a petulant manner that exacerbated the differences between them. I also disapprove of how President Obama handled Netanyahu’s statements regarding the two state solution. Recall on the evening of Netanyahu’s election, he made a statement suggesting that the time was not now ripe for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Immediately following his election, Netanyahu reasserted his commitment to the two state solution. Instead of reacting in a statesmanlike way by focusing on Netanyahu’s positive restatement, Obama reemphasized his opposition to Netanyahu’s previous negative statements. This was poor politics, poor statesmanship and poor psychology.
Regarding the deal with Iran, President Obama had said that as between accepting the deal and rejecting it, the only realistic option is to accept it. He may be right, but he was wrong to get us into the position where the only options may be bad and worse.
I will continue to be critical of President Obama and his administration where I believe criticism is warranted, but I will continue to express approval and admiration for our President when he acts in a positive fashion.
President Obama’s speech to the Jewish Congregation in Washington DC was excellent. He talked about shared values between our country and Israel and between him and the Jewish community. His policies with regard to health care and many other domestic issues are consistent with those of a majority of American Jews. We should neither demonize nor lionize our President. We should criticize him where criticism is warranted, praise him where praise is justified and encourage him to be supportive of Israel. There is too much extremism at play when it comes to President Obama. People who hate him, hate him too much and without justification. Some people who love him, love him too much and without nuanced criticism.
So let’s continue to watch carefully how this administration deals with foreign policy issues, especially with regard to Israel and Iran and let’s be constructive and nuanced in both our criticism and our support.
In his speech to the Congregation, President Obama invited “scrutiny” of his foreign policy actions, particularly with regard to Iran. We should accept his invitation and offer good faith and constructive criticism.
