Posting in papers of
the western world has become pointless. Here is an example what happened to my
posts to the article
Why Syria and not Iran? The Iranian nuclear threat is orders of magnitude more dangerous that the Syrian chemical one.
Google: the House of Commons abdicating its duty regarding the Iranian nuclear threat?
There isn't an Iranian nuclear threat. It's a fabrication by the US and Israel. Just like the military coup and overthrow of a democratically elected government in Iran was orchestrated by the CIA in the 1950s so they could shove their puppet (the Shah) into power.
It's lie after lie after lie coming from America, and the gullible, the paranoid and the stupid believe them.
Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Nope.
Murder of civilians by Assad with chemical weapons? Nope. Evidence coming out points to the rebels.
"We don't spy on the world" - America for decades. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we now know differently.
"We didn't orchestrate the military coup that overthrew an Iranian government in the 1950s" -- CIA insisted for more than 50 years. Earlier this month, the American government finally admitted "Yep. It was us".
America, no matter which government is in office, does nothing but concoct lies about other countries and other leaders to further its own aims. You are colossally stupid if you don't understand this.
Well, we are back where we were 80 years ago. From the speech by Anthony Eden as FO undersecretary during Ramsay Mac Donald’s government in the House of Commons on March 23, 1933, taken from William Manchester’s The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill: Alone 1932-1940, page 98:
How could anyone misinterpret the prime minister’s reply to the rising Nazis? It was certain, Eden earnestly told the House, to “secure for Europe that period of appeasement which is needed.” If appeased, Hitler’s anger would vanish; his fear of encirclement would disappear; the Nazis, freed from anguish and insecurity, would become sensible, stable neighbors in a Europe free of rancor. The House gave him a standing ovation – Churchill and those around him remained seated
In the House of Commons, on May 2, 1935, Winston Churchill said:
“When the situation was manageable it was neglected, and now that it is thoroughly out of hand, we apply the remedies which then might have effected a cure. There is nothing new in the story. It is as old as the Sibylline books. It falls into that long dismal catalogue of the fruitlessness of experience and the confirmed unteachability of mankind. Want of foresight, unwillingness to act when action would be simple and effective, lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong – these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history."
Not remotely the same thing.
Really? And you know more about Iran than Bernard Lewis the leading scholar of Islam in the west, Reza Kahlili,former member of the Revolutionary Guards , Raphael Israeli, Matthias Kuntzel, Harold Rhode and James Woolsey?
Bernard Lewis:
In this context, the deterrent that worked so well during the Cold War, namely M.A.D. (Mutual Assured Destruction) , would have no meaning. At the End of Time, there will be general destruction anyway. What will matter is the final destination of the dead-- hell for the infidels, and the delights of heaven for the believers. For people with this mindset, M.A.D. is not a constraint; it is an inducement...
Google: Why are Bernard Lewis's views on MAD ignored?
Matthias Küntzel:
There are other dictatorships in the world. But only in Iran are the fantasy-worlds of antisemitism and religious mission linked with technological megalomania and the physics of mass destruction. The specific danger presented by the Iranian nuclear option stems from the unique ideological atmosphere surrounding it – a mixture of holy war and high-tec, of antisemitism and weapons-grade uranium, of death-wish and missile research, of Shiite messianism and plutonium
Google:
Matthias Küntzel - Antisemitism, Messianism and the Cult of Sacrifice:The Iranian Holy War
Matthias Küntzel - Antisemitism, Messianism and the Cult of Sacrifice:The Iranian Holy War
one thing is that it could be of interest to 'disarm' Iran the purported nuclear armaments but not until israel, that evil little good for nothing country, has agreed to give up it's nuclear capability - until then Iran is fully entitled to e nuclear armed!
My answer below to the above post was censored twice. The second time I removed "this garbage' . The post disappeared as well.
You write "that evil little good for nothing country"
Well, the Intel processor you are writing this garbage on was designed by Intel Israel and so was the disk on key you use, not to mention the Waze software that Google just bought for $1.1 billion
And let's not forget the 6 Israeli science Nobel prizes - Dan Shechtman, Chemistry, 2011, Ada E. Yonath, Chemistry, 2009, Robert Aumann,, Economics, 2005, Aaron Ciechanover, Chemistry, 2004, Avram Hershko, Chemistry, 2004 , Daniel Kahneman, Economics, 2002 which is three times more than the whole Muslim world of 1500000000 people contributed since they all together have only Ahmed Zewail, Chemistry, 1999 and Abdus Salam, Physics, 1979
