The world's largest state-sponsor of
terror, sworn to destroy Israel, is approaching the nuclear threshold. It's not
an existential threat for the US. It is for Israel.
Later this month, representatives of the world powers and Iran will meet in Vienna to discuss reviving the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Cooperation – the Iran nuclear deal. In the runup to the talks, the United States and Israel have reiterated their determination to prevent Iran from producing nuclear weapons. Both have stated their preference for a diplomatic means of achieving that goal. But there the symmetry ends. While the United States can live with an Iran that has the ability to make a bomb but doesn’t do so, Israel simply cannot.
The disparity was clear at a recent press conference with Secretary State Anthony Blinken and Israeli and Emirati counterparts. Blinken reiterated his administration’s longstanding insistence that “Iran cannot be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon.” By contrast, Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid warned that “Iran is becoming a nuclear threshold country,” and that Israelis “have no intention of letting this happen.”
What is the difference between an Iran that could
quickly make a bomb and an Iran that already has one? Why would America
implicitly accept a threshold-capable Iran while Israel regards it as a
strategic – and potentially existential – threat?
“Threshold” describes a nuclear program that has all the components
necessary for swiftly making a bomb. Enriching uranium to the 90% level
necessary for weaponization takes as much as two years. But by enriching
uranium to 60%, as it does now, Iran has completed the longest stretch of the
process and is now installing centrifuges capable of spinning four or even six
times faster than the current rate. Once it decides to break out and create a
nuclear arsenal, Iran can do so in a matter of weeks or even days – well before
the international community could react.
And Iran will inevitably break out. Several
countries have what is sometimes called “Japan-like capabilities,” a reference
to Japan’s own threshold nuclear program. But Japan is not Iran, a country
ruled by the world’s largest state-sponsors of terror, which works to overthrow
pro-Western governments, and vows to wipe Israel off the map. Having the
ability to make a bomb, no matter how quickly, will not suffice for Iranian
rulers. They saw what happened to Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Libya’s Muammar
Qaddafi, both of whom forfeited their nuclear ambitions and died, and what
didn’t happen to Kim Jung-un, who kept his and become almost untouchable. Yet,
beyond regime survival, the bomb is vital for Iranian prestige. A weapon
possessed by Sunni Pakistan, Hindu India, and, presumably, by the Jewish State
cannot be denied to the Shiite Islamic Republic.
Yet Iran does not have to possess the bomb to
damage Israel irreparably. Threshold capacity provides Iranian-backed
terrorists with a nuclear umbrella that can open and shield them from
retaliation. Responding to rocket attacks from Hezbollah or Hamas, Israel will
be hobbled by the fear of an Iranian breakout. Defending the country will be
dangerously more difficult.
Such fears are much less pronounced in the United
States, a country situated far from Iran and not threatened with national
destruction – a United States which, moreover, has no desire to become
embroiled in another overseas conflict. For that reason, the Biden
Administration pledges to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons but not
to prevent Iran from attaining the ability to make them. For that reason,
President Biden vows to consider “other options” should Iran not return to the
negotiating table but does not echo President Obama’s warnings of “all options
are on the table,” including a military strike.
Israelis view this policy with profound skepticism.
A threshold Iran will drive other Middle Eastern states to attempt to achieve
the same capability, creating a highly unstable region teetering on a nuclear
threshold. Together with its continuing efforts to produce a deliverable
warhead – amply documented by the nuclear archive Israel’s Mossad secreted out
of Teheran – Iran has developed intercontinental ballistic missiles that can
already hit central Europe and will eventually reach the North American coast.
Global security will be undermined.
For Israel, though, the timetable for action is
much shorter, and while our military capabilities cannot equal America’s, we do
have the means to defend ourselves. And though Israel has no expectations of US
military intervention, we trust that the United States will provide us with the
logistical, diplomatic and legal assistance we need and stand by all its Middle
Eastern allies. Doing so will not only deal a decisive blow to Iran’s nuclear
ambitions but will also restore America’s regional prestige.
As the nuclear talks resume, Israel will be
watching to see if Iran exploits them to camouflage its march toward threshold
capability. If so, irrespective of the international backlash, Israel will be
forced to act. Recalling that both he and the Secretary of State are the sons
of Holocaust survivors, Lapid stressed the need for nations to protect
themselves against evil, and especially against an Iran sworn to destroy the
Jewish state. “Israel reserves the right to act at any given moment, in any
way,” he said. America, and the world, should listen.
Michael
Oren: Why Obama is wrong about Iran being 'rational' on nukes
****
It was already clear in 2008 that this would
happen. My article from then:
