Iran is back on the agenda!
A predominantly one-topic blog: how is it that the most imminent and lethal implication for humankind - the fact that the doctrine of "Mutually Assured Destruction" will not work with Iran - is not being discussed in our media? Until it is recognized that MAD is dead, the Iranian threat will be treated as a threat only to Israel and not as the global threat which it in fact is. A blog by Mladen Andrijasevic
Translate
Sunday, January 22, 2017
Saturday, January 21, 2017
Donald Trump returns Winston Churchill's bust to the Oval Office
![]() |
| Churchill bust with George W Bush |
- By David Millward, us correspondent
Within hours of moving into the
White House, Donald Trump has honoured his pledge to return the bust of Winston
Churchill to the Oval Office.
The Jacob Epstein sculpture was given to
President George W Bush by Tony Blair.
It was displayed in the Oval Office but was
removed by President Barack Obama and replaced by a bust of Martin Luther King
in 2009.
The former president's
decision to send the bust back to the British embassy in Washington was greeted with outrage on both sides of
the Atlantic.
Mr Obama sought to deflect the criticism by
saying he had a second bust of Churchill which he kept in his private quarters.
“My private office is called the Treaty Room.
Right outside the door of the Treaty Room so that I see it every day, including
on weekends when I’m going into that office to watch a basketball game, the
primary image I see is a bust of Winston Churchill,” he said.
But critics were unconvinced. Boris Johnson,
who was London mayor at the time, said the move was a "snub to
Britain". He suggested that the decision had been fuelled by what he
described as Mr Obama's "ancestral dislike of the British Empire".
Mr Trump, who has a Scottish mother and is
regarded as an Anglophile, had hinted that he was ready to return the bust to
its pride of place in the Oval Office in a New York Times interview.
The case for returning the Epstein bust to the
White House was pressed by Nigel Farage, the former UKIP leader, who forged a
close relationship with Mr Trump.
***
To me this was one
of the first markers that indicated how dangerous the Obama presidency would be.
As one who had read most of Churchill’s books and several Churchill biographies, I was appalled when I learned the Obama had removed the bust from
the White House. If Obama had so little respect for Churchill who in 1940 stood
alone facing Hitler and saved western civilization, then it was obvious that
Obama did not care for our civilization.
Thank you, President Trump for returning Churchill's bust to the Oval Office.
Friday, January 20, 2017
Trump's inaugural speech on uniting the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism
“We will
reinforce old alliances and form new ones and unite the civilized world against
radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate from the face of the Earth.”
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Good riddance! Obama to leave office today.
Well, if anybody had any remaining doubts what
he stood for, this final act clarifies it. But what Obama has done on the world
stage is just horrific. To paraphrase Churchill,
never in modern history have the lives of so many people put in jeopardy by so
few.
The sunset clause of the Iran Deal enables Iran
to become a nuclear power in 13 years even if it sticks to the terms of the agreement.
How under Obama’s leadership could the P5+1 powers sign such a dangerous deal will be up to
historians to clarify. I would say it is a combination of ignorance about Islam,
especially Shi’a eschatology, on the one
hand and political correctness as euphemism
for political cowardice on the other. The political elites know that something is
not right, but in contrast to Churchill they do not know what their enemy
believes in. Those who do, skip
over the truth like Boris Johnson did in his book The
Churchill Factor – a perfect example of political cowardice.
But in the end it all boils down to ignorance.
Reversing the Iran Deal must be priority number one for the
new President and Congress. Of all the
disasters Obama foreign policy has created, and there are so many, from supporting
the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to not enforcing
his red line in Syria, the Iran Deal stands
out as the most significant and dangerous error the west has committed in modern
history. Not since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 have we put ourselves in such
peril.
In two hours we will have made it. The Obama nightmare is finally ending
In 2009 I wrote an article in the American Thinker How
will Israel survive Obama's naïveté on Iran?
In two hours we will have made it. The Obama nightmare is finally ending
Mayor of Jerusalem Nir Barkat welcomes Trump
The Obama nightmare will end on January 20, 2017, 12:00 NOON EST (GMT-5) i.e. 07:00 p.m. Israel Time (GMT +02:00).
Saturday, January 7, 2017
U.S. ambassadors appointed by Obama must quit by Inauguration Day
U.S. President-elect
Donald Trump's transition team has issued a blanket mandate for politically
appointed ambassadors installed by President Barack Obama to leave their posts
by Inauguration Day, the U.S. ambassador to New Zealand said on Friday.
"I will be
departing on January 20th," Ambassador Mark Gilbert said in a Twitter
message to Reuters.
The mandate was issued
"without exceptions" through an order sent in a State Department
cable on Dec. 23, Gilbert said.
He was confirming a report in
the New York Times, which quoted diplomatic sources as saying previous U.S.
administrations, from both major political parties, have traditionally granted
extensions to allow a few such ambassadors, particularly those with school-age
children, to remain in place for weeks or months.
State Department spokesman
John Kirby said it was "common" procedure for all
politically-appointed ambassadors to step down as a new U.S. administration
comes in on Jan. 20.
"All political appointees for the Obama
administration were directed to submit their resignation and the due date was
Dec. 7, and the resignations are to take effect on Jan. 20," Kirby told
reporters. "That is common, typical practise ... that's the way it
works."
Kirby said, as expected, no career diplomats serving as ambassadors
had been asked to resign by the transition team.
He acknowledged, however, that in the past there had been
exceptions made for a small number of political appointees to stay on for a
short time for personal reasons. "But that is totally in the prerogative
of the incoming administration," he added.
The order could leave the United States without
Senate-confirmed envoys for months in critical nations like Germany, Canada and
Britain, the New York Times reported.
A senior Trump transition official told the newspaper there
was no ill will in the move, describing it as a simple matter of ensuring
Obama's overseas envoys leave the government on schedule, just as thousands of
political aides at the White House and in federal agencies must do.
Trump has taken a strict stance against leaving any of
Obama's political appointees in place as he prepares to take office on Jan. 20,
aiming to break up many of his predecessor's signature foreign and domestic
policy achievements, the newspaper said.
Diplomats told the New York Times that the order has
thrown their personal lives into a tailspin, leaving them scrambling to secure
living arrangements and acquire visas allowing them to stay in their countries
so their children can remain in school.
Saturday, December 31, 2016
Reductio ad absurdum of UNSC Resolution 2334
Melanie Philllips explains the
reason for the unprecedented rebuke to the Obama
administration over the Israel-bashing speech by US Secretary of State John
Kerry on Thursday this way:
“So why the screeching U-turn? Almost certainly it was because of the
ferocious pushback from both Israel and US President-elect Donald Trump which
presumably made Mrs May realise she had created a diplomatic crisis between the
UK and its two ostensible allies.”
Melanie Phillips is right, but there is an additional
reason, explained by Charles Krauthammer in his column:
“It’s the
third category of “settlement” that is the most contentious and that Security
Council Resolution 2334 explicitly condemns: East Jerusalem. This is not just scandalous; it’s absurd. America acquiesces to a declaration that, as a matter of international
law, the Jewish state has no claim on the Western Wall, the Temple Mount,
indeed the entire Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem. They belong to Palestine.”
We have come to the point
where world animosity towards Israel has morphed into UN resolutions that have
become so absurd that this absurdity is the very proof that they are wrong.
From Wikipedia
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction
to absurdity"; or argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of
argument which attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by
showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible
Almost everybody in the
West gets carried away by attacking Israel. It has become a Pavlovian reflex. However, logical thinking is still an important
component of western thought and when mathematical absurdity stares you in the
face even the dumbest take notice.
Reductio
ad absurdum works in math (Here is a link to why the square root of 2 is
irrational) . It works in politics too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






