Friday, October 13, 2017
The Iran deal decertification and the Bernard Lewis white elephant in the middle of the room
President Trump has just decertified the Iran deal. The media reaction from the left is negative, the one from the right supportive. And yet both sides have one thing in common which is that for some weird reason nobody seems to care what Bernard Lewis says. And what he has been saying for many years is that “For people with this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement....”
One would have thought that a statement of this importance which states that the main doctrine that kept the USSR and the US from blowing each other up (and the whole world along with them) during the Cold War does not apply to Iran would be discussed and checked for accuracy. Not at all, it is being completely ignored. In the last 5 years only Netanyahu at the UNGA and Michael Oren in the LA Times quoted it.
How can we explain this? Five years ago I gave this explanation “And yet, the reviewers do not know what to do with MAD. On the one hand, here is a most erudite, respected scholar and on the other, he is saying such, to them, off the wall things no one else dares to mention. What to do? The best thing is to ignore it. Perhaps if someone else in the media would volunteer and bring up the topic, they would pitch in. No one in the main stream media does”.
Has anything changed since 2012? The Iran deal was covered extensively in the press in 2015 and it its decertification is being analyzed yet again now, still with no mention of Bernard Lewis.
So it is time to ask the journalists explicitly: Why do you, Charles Krauthammer, Bret Stephens, Yaakov Katz, Caroline Glick never, ever quote “For people with this mindset, MAD is not a constraint; it is an inducement....”? What do you think about what Bernard Lewis has been saying?
Posted by Mladen Andrijasevic at 2:30 PM